| |
Breast Cancer Research
Current Clinical Practice
Breast cancer affects
about 1 in 12 New Zealand women, and is the most common cause of death
from any type of cancer for women in this country.
Routine histopathology analysis is a vital part of diagnostic work-up,
with the evaluation of breast specimens determining the surgical and
treatment options used. At diagnosis, breast cancer is presently classified
according
to tumour size, degree of invasion,
histomorphology, tumour architecture,
hormone receptor status,
ERBB2 (HER-2) gene copy number status, and then lymph-node involvement
which is a major prognostic factor. Each of these parameters will impact
on clinical management pathways, but treatment response and long-term
survival
outcomes for individual women classified in these conventional ways
is still not accurately predicted. Treatments based on currently known
targets
fail in many cancers expressing these targets.
Current breast cancer treatment duration for early disease typically
includes a combination of surgical removal with or without radiotherapy
and systemic therapies. Chemotherapy and hormone treatments adjuvant
or neoadjuvant to surgery and radiotherapy have improved disease free
interval and overall survival. Computer programmes such as adjuvantonline.com
help predict risk of recurrence and death, and measure benefit from use
of chemotherapy and hormonal treatments. However, women with apparently
good prognosis still relapse, while others do better than expected.
There is a need for more refined diagnostic criteria so that appropriate
treatments are
better targeted to individual patients.
Breast Cancer Genetics
Breast cancer is a genetic disease that develops when one or more
cells within the tissue of the breast start to grow without normal
controls. Some breast cancers are caused by germline mutations within
breast cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1 or BRCA2. Mutations
in these genes may be inherited, they are found in all cells of affected
individuals, and typically confer a lifetime risk of breast cancer.
However, these inherited forms are rare. Most breast cancers are
caused by genetic changes that are found only in the cancer cells
and acquired during lifetime. Additional genetic changes will typically
accumulate in cells of the primary tumour, and will further influence
growth advantage. |
|
In recent years, genome-wide
microarray profiling technologies have allowed
identification of clinically distinct breast cancer subtypes
based on the types
of genes that are expressed in the cancer cells. These findings
reinforce the notion that genetic markers have potential to be
applied for breast cancer diagnosis with the same confidence
that they are currently used to characterise distinct subtypes
of leukaemia or sarcoma. However, gene expression profiling is
both expensive and technically demanding to a level that is not
currently amenable to most routine diagnostic settings. Thus,
although there is a major shift in the breast cancer paradigm
that cannot be ignored, there are practical hurdles that limit
feasibility to translate important findings into routine diagnostics.
|
 Image from Walker
et al, Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2007 Oct 15;178(2):94-103 |
Simpler, more stable and less costly approaches
are needed to distinguish the newly recognised breast cancer subtypes.
These approaches include immunohistochemistry
(IHC), fluorescent
in situ hybridisation (FISH) or polymerase
chain reaction (PCR), all of which are presently
used to enhance routine diagnostic pathology practice. However, success of these applications would rely on the use of
appropriate marker panels, which in turn depends on knowledge of
biologically relevant genes. In this regard, more research is needed
to extend present understanding of the gene networks most relevant
to normal breast cell development and to breast malignancy. Procedures
such as IHC, PCR and FISH also yield very limited information about
the overall genetic composition of cancer cells compared with global
profiling by microarray analysis. A different type of microarray
technology platform known as array
comparative genomic hybridisation or “array
CGH” is now allowing scientists to analyse
chromosomal DNA of human cells with sensitivity and at ultra-high
resolution not previously possible using conventional cytogenetic
methods. In contrast to labile RNA used for expression profiling,
tumour DNA is stable, relatively easy to transport, and can be
obtained from archival paraffin tissue blocks.
|
Array CGH has identified specific segments of
DNA, known as “copy
number variants” (CNVs)
or “structural variants”,
that may be lost, gained or altered in structure in the
genomic make-up of some individuals but not in others.
More than
17,000 such variants have been identified so far, but still
very little
is understood about their health relevance. When inherited
or otherwise congenitally present in all cells of an individual
from birth, some configurations of these CNVs may predispose
to particular clinical syndromes or to cancer development.
Conversely,
when acquired during lifetime, CNVs may mark genetic changes
of relevance to the cause and progression of malignancy.
To this end, array CGH has been applied now for

the
identification of
DNA copy number changes in the affected tissues of many
different types of cancer. Extending a wealth of knowledge
learned
through
the application of conventional cytogenetics, especially
karyotyping, array CGH is revealing DNA copy number variations
specific
to different cancer subtypes, and which are strong biological
indicators
for diagnosis, for more accurate prognosis and new drug development.
|
Our Study
We have been applying FISH, CGH, and high resolution microarray
technologies in a prospective study designed to identify molecular
events which may be of clinical significance to patients who have
breast cancer of ductal origin. Close collaboration between clinical
oncologists, surgeons, histopathologists and researchers is ensuring
optimal documentation of relevant clinical parameters at diagnosis,
during post-operative treatment, and through disease recurrence,
and of proper histopathological characterisation, tissue sampling
and storage for genetic analysis.
Understanding the genetic differences between different breast
cancer subtypes will improve the accuracy of diagnosis, enable
better prognostic stratification and inevitably lead to the development
of more effective treatment options.
Image
from Walker et al, Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008 May;47(5):405-17
|
|
|